Imagine waking up to a retirement that's barely covering your basic needs, while your neighbors across the pond are enjoying a more lavish golden years – that's the stark reality for many in the UK when it comes to state pensions. But here's where it gets controversial: despite massive protests and political upheaval in countries like France and Italy over pension reforms, those nations still boast some of the most generous systems in the developed world. Meanwhile, our own UK setup often lags behind, raising questions about fairness and sustainability that could spark heated debates. Let's unpack this together, shall we?
First off, a quick note: remember, the value of your investments and any income they generate can fluctuate – it might decrease just as easily as it increases, potentially leaving you with less than what you put in initially.
State pensions aren't just a dry policy topic; they're deeply personal and politically explosive, stirring passions like few other issues. Picture this: millions of French people flooded the streets in outrage when President Macron pushed the retirement age from 62 to 64. In Italy, things got even rowdier in 2011 when a parliamentary debate on pension changes erupted into a full-blown brawl, forcing a suspension of proceedings. Yet, as our Fidelity research reveals, France and Italy still offer some of the most accommodating state pensions among advanced economies. And while direct apples-to-apples comparisons are tricky, certain benchmarks suggest the UK's state pension might rank among the least generous in the G7 group of leading nations. And this is the part most people miss – why do we accept such disparities without questioning the bigger picture?
- Stay informed on market trends, ISA options, pension strategies, and more by subscribing here (https://page.ei.fidelity.co.uk/manageyoursubscriptions.html).
Evaluating the generosity of state pensions across the G7 isn't straightforward. Each country's framework operates uniquely, with differences in eligibility criteria for a full pension, how benefits get adjusted over time, how they blend with other elderly support programs, and a host of other variables. But we can gain valuable insights by examining key indicators. In our analysis, we focused on:
The gross replacement rate for a typical worker.
- This measures the state pension's value compared to your working earnings. For instance, a 60% rate means your pension replaces 60% of an average salary, both figures before taxes. We based this on a standard worker starting at age 22 and working a complete career.
The average duration someone can anticipate receiving the state pension.
- We derived this by contrasting the age for claiming a full pension against life expectancy at 65. Pension ages were set for individuals born in 1960.
Public expenditure on old-age pensions as a share of Gross Domestic Product (GDP).
Cross-referencing these in G7 nations uncovered notable variances in pension systems.
| Country | Gross Replacement Rate (%) | State Pension Age (for someone born in 1960 to receive full pension)* | Average Female Life Expectancy (at age 65) | Expected Years Receiving State Pension | Government Spending on Old-Age Pensions as % of GDP (%) |
|---------|----------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
| Canada | 37 | 65 | 87.2 | 22.2 | 4.7 |
| France | 58 | 62 | 88.6 | 26.6 | 12 |
| Germany | 44 | 66.3 | 86.2 | 19.9 | 9.8 |
| Italy | 76 | 67 | 87.6 | 20.6 | 12.8 |
| Japan | 32 | 65 | 89.4 | 24.4 | 8.9 |
| USA | 39 | 67 | 85.7 | 18.7 | 6.6 |
| UK | 22 | 66.3** | 86.1 | 19.8 | 4.7 |
Sources: * The age for claiming full benefits without reductions. ** UK pension age for 1960 births varies from 66 to 66 and nine months based on birth date; we used the midpoint (July 2), rounding to 66.3 years. OECD Pensions at a Glance 2023 and ‘Pensions: International Comparisons’ briefing from House of Commons Library.
Let's zoom in on replacement rates – who scores highest and lowest? Italy stands out as the clear leader here. A typical retiree there can look forward to about three-quarters (76%) of their pre-retirement earnings coming from the state pension. On the flip side, the UK trails far behind, with pensions covering under a quarter of past salaries. These disparities highlight how nations prioritize retirement responsibility. In Britain, the burden falls heavily on individuals to build savings through workplace pensions, which form the main pillar of their later years, while the state pension acts more as a supplement for those with modest incomes. In contrast, places like France and Italy lean on public schemes as the primary income source for retirees.
Data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) backs this up: roughly 40% of seniors' income in the UK stems from government sources, versus over 70% in France and Italy.¹ This raises a provocative question: should the state shoulder more of the load, or is personal responsibility the key to a secure future?
Shifting gears, another yardstick for generosity is the projected length of time enjoying the pension. Here, variations are huge – ranging from nearly 27 years in France to under 19 in the US. Much of this stems from earlier retirement ages: someone born in 1960 in France might claim full benefits at 62, while Italians and Americans wait until 67. Yet, lifespan also plays a role. Japan's longer life expectancy allows over 24 years of pension receipt. The UK sits near the bottom, with 1960-born individuals averaging about 20 more years post-pension start. But here's the twist: a hefty pension loses value if health declines. Retiring at 62 versus 67 might mean the same total years, but the earlier retiree likely enjoys more in good health.
To explore this, we also factored in healthy life expectancy – the years lived without significant health issues. France and Japan topped this list, while the US and UK lagged. UK residents might only enjoy around 11 healthy years on their pension, trailing France by five. For beginners, think of it as the difference between having a pension that lets you travel freely versus one that confines you due to illness.
| Country | State Pension Age (for someone born in 1960 to receive full pension) | Average Healthy Life Expectancy (at age 60) | Expected Healthy Years Receiving State Pension |
|---------|------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
| Canada | 65 | 78.5 | 13.5 |
| France | 62 | 78.6 | 16.6 |
| Germany | 66.3 | 77.3 | 11 |
| Italy | 67 | 78.4 | 11.4 |
| Japan | 65 | 80.4 | 15.4 |
| USA | 67 | 75.7 | 8.7 |
| UK | 66.3 | 77.5 | 11.2 |
Source: World Health Organisation (https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/indicators/indicator-details/GHO/gho-ghe-hale-healthy-life-expectancy-at-age-60), 2025.
As lifespans extend, funding pensions becomes increasingly challenging. Governments worldwide are responding by delaying retirement ages, but this often provokes backlash, particularly when healthy years don't keep pace with overall longevity, shortening the period of active enjoyment. Socio-economic divides exacerbate this: individuals in disadvantaged neighborhoods typically have shorter, less healthy lives than those in affluent ones.² In the UK, according to The Health Foundation, residents of the most privileged areas gain an extra 19 years of good health compared to the most deprived – a disparity that underscores inequality in retirement quality.
So, how does the UK stack up across the board? We scored G7 countries from 1 to 7 in each metric (gross replacement rate, expected pension years, and GDP spending share), then averaged the rankings. The UK ranked lowest overall, dead last in replacement rates and tied for bottom in spending. France emerged as the top performer, with Italy close behind.
| Country | Gross Replacement Rate (%) | Expected Years Receiving State Pension | Government Spending on Old-Age Pensions as % of GDP (%) | Average Ranking |
|---------|----------------------------|---------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|
| Canada | 5 | 3 | 6.5 | 4.8 |
| France | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1.7 |
| Germany | 3 | 5 | 3 | 3.7 |
| Italy | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 |
| Japan | 6 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
| USA | 4 | 7 | 5 | 5.3 |
| UK | 7 | 6 | 6.5 | 6.5 |
Source: Fidelity International.
That said, these frameworks vary greatly, so direct comparisons need caution. Moreover, our metrics overlook a vital element: the contributions required from individuals. In the UK, current pensions draw mainly from National Insurance payments by today's workers – typically 8% on earnings over £12,570 and 2% on amounts above £50,270. Italians, however, contribute 9-11% of salaries to social security, encompassing pensions alongside maternity, sickness, and other benefits.³ This omission could be the key factor in debates over who gets the better deal.
At the end of the day, British savers should realize the state pension alone won't suffice for a decent retirement – supplementing it is essential. For more on managing hidden risks or planning your income stream, check out these articles:
* The overlooked danger in retirement planning – and strategies to address it (https://www.fidelity.co.uk/markets-insights/personal-finance/saving-for-retirement/the-silent-retirement-risk-we-all-ignore-and-how-to-manage-it/)
* Understanding the Triple Lock: future state pension projections (https://www.fidelity.co.uk/markets-insights/personal-finance/personal-finance/triple-lock-what-will-the-state-pension-be-in-the-future/)
* Building a reliable retirement income (https://www.fidelity.co.uk/markets-insights/personal-finance/saving-for-retirement/how-to-create-a-retirement-salary/)
Sources:
1 OECD Pensions at a Glance 2023 (https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2023/12/pensions-at-a-glance-2023_4757bf20/678055dd-en.pdf), Figure 7.1
2 The Health Foundation (https://www.health.org.uk/evidence-hub/health-inequalities/inequalities-in-life-expectancy-and-healthy-life-expectancy), Inequalities in life expectancy and healthy life expectancy, 17 February 2025
3 Taxing.it (https://taxing.it/italian-social-security-contributions/), Social Security contributions, October 2025
Important information: Please be aware that opinions shared here might not reflect the latest developments and could already be outdated. This isn't tailored advice for any specific investment. ISA eligibility and tax implications vary by individual situation, and rules can evolve. Pension withdrawals are restricted until age 55 (rising to 57 in 2028). If you're uncertain about an investment's fit, consult a Fidelity advisor (https://www.fidelity.co.uk/services/advice/) or your chosen authorized financial expert.
What are your thoughts on this? Do you believe the UK's system unfairly burdens individuals compared to more state-led approaches in Europe? Is raising the pension age a necessary evil, or does it deepen inequalities? Share your views in the comments – I'd love to hear agreements, disagreements, or fresh perspectives!
